Project Report #3
No revisions since Report #2
Goal, Objectives and Task Analysis
Goals:
Students will gain fluency in speaking French in classroom.
Students will add value to speaking by forging a relationship with other French speaking students outside of our classroom.
Students will engage in activities that work well with their multiple intelligences.
Students will provide feedback to teacher and reflect on the process of improving French speaking.
Goal Statement:
Students will use authentic speaking experiences and classroom experiences to increase fluency in French.
Project Report #2
One-to-one Formative Evaluation
Purpose: To see if increasing the number of kinsesthetic learning activities increased learning of writing section on quiz.
Audience: Eighth grade class of five French I-B students.
Procedures: Students used kinesthetic activities such as Dictation Races, to do advanced writing section on the quiz.
Dictation Races: Teacher puts note cards with sentences on each on the board. Each student takes turns running to the board and then back to their partner, dictating the sentence on the board for their partner to write down. Teacher checks sentences when they think they are finished. If they are not correct, they have to go back and fix them. The first team to have all sentences correct win.
Materials: Quiz 5-1A Section C; Quiz 6-1A, Section C
Results:

As you can see, my top students were already able to write clear sentences using the correct spelling and grammar, but a huge improvement happened in my lower performing students. The student who improved the most, also had the highest bodily-kinesthetic scores on the Multiple Intelligences Test.

As a result of these drastic changes with my lower performing students, I will definitely incorporate more bodily-kinesthetic activities into my lessons. I will do at least one daily.
Small Group Evaluation
Purpose: To see if students were noticing changes in their learning because of the increased focus on French speaking.
Audience: Eighth grade class of five French I-B students.
Procedure: Students met with the teacher and answered questions together. Then, each student put his or her own answers on the Google Form.
Summary: Students overwhelmingly found that getting to speak French with native speakers enhanced their learning. They also have found that using more varied and kinesthetic activities focused on speaking are helping them on their assessments.
Discussion: Students are quite articulate at expressing what is working and what isn’t in their classes. As Shortt says, “enhancing student input on matters of content and design can facilitate effective deep learning” (2002). Why are we not putting more of the design of our classes in the hands of the students? If they have more of a stake in how the class is running, they would participate more in their own learning. In the small group meeting, the students expressed how much they are enjoying knowing the behind the scenes part of designing our class. They feel empowered in their learning and it is making a huge difference in their motivation to learn.
Revisions: I am going to create a new template for my lesson plans that includes a place for which of the multiple intelligences each activity is using. By making sure the students are engaged in varied activities, I can see which of them work best. Also, I will be able to track how many of each type I am using.
References
Fenner, D., Mansour, S., & Sydor, N. (2010). The Effects of Differentiation and Motivation on Students’ Performance. Master of Arts Action Research Project. Retrieved from ERIC database
Shortt, K. (2002). The Benefits of Negotiating Student versus Staff Control over Learning. Psychology Teaching Review, 10(1), 61-7. Retrieved from ERIC database